All News

Daily Bridge in New Zealand

Setsuko Lichtnecker and Peer Bach.

Favourites off the pace in the National Swiss Pairs.

12 by 9 board rounds of Swiss Pairs produced surprising but worthy winners in the National Swiss Pairs this last weekend at the Auckland Bridge Club. There were 28 pairs in the North/South and East/West fields with victory going to two local pairs, Peer Bach – Setsuko Lichtnecker, North/South, and Paula Boughey/Duncan Badley, East/West.

These were the top positions:

 

North/South

     

vps

East/West

     

vps

1

Peer Bach

Setsuko Lichtnecker

150.34

1

Paula Boughey

Duncan Badley

151.44

                         

2

Pam Livingston

Malcolm Mayer

 

146.64

2

Hugh McGann

Michael Ware

150.28

                         

3

GeO Tislevoll

Prem Soundra

 

143.65

3

Brad Johnston

Sam Coutts

140.83

                         

4

Jeremy Fraser-Hoskin

Moss Wylie

 

138.66

4

Blair Fisher

Jack James

139.20

                         

5

Jerry Chen

Kevin Hu

 

136.29

5

Linda Cartner

Glenis Palmer

136.11

 

 

The Auckland-Northland Region and Auckland Bridge Club went to great lengths to promote the event as a quality face-to-face competition. Aided by the directing team of Lorraine Stachurski and Paul Coleman and Kevin Walker, the scorer, the event lived up to this aim.

Here’s one board which helped one of the top finishing pairs along the way. It is a lead problem for you:

Bridge in NZ.png nz map.jpg

     

South Deals
E-W Vul

 

N

W

 

E

S

   
 

J 10 9 7

K 8 5

K 6

Q J 8 7

 

West

North

East

South

 

 

 

Pass

1 ♣

2 

2 

3 

3 

Pass

5 

Pass

6 

All pass

 

 

1Club-small promised at least 2 clubs. 2Diamond-small was a weak jump after which East-West established a heart fit. East’s jump to 5Heart-small asked their partner to bid slam if they held a control in the opponents’ suit, diamonds. West said they did. So, your lead is?

While West could have a shortage in diamonds, it is also very likely they held the ace. It would appear that East has at least two small diamonds or else they would not have asked the question. Thus, if you chose to lead a diamond, it would surely not matter which.

What about other options? Since we have 10 hcp, it is likely our partner has not too much, certainly not much outside diamonds. Both black suit leads (top of sequence) look fairly safe, the club less so. We could try a trump which might cut down possible ruffs..or else it is back to leading our suit.

South did choose a diamond…but not the king.

South Deals
E-W Vul

K 8 6 5

4 3

9 8 7 5 4 3

5

4 2

Q 9 2

A Q

K 10 9 6 3 2

 

N

W

 

E

S

 

A Q 3

A J 10 7 6

J 10 2

A 4

 

J 10 9 7

K 8 5

K 6

Q J 8 7

 

West

North

East

South

 

 

 

Pass

1 ♣

2 

2 

3 

3 

Pass

5 

Pass

6 

All pass

 

 

Making 12 tricks on this lay-out was by no means straightforward but would be much easier if declarer saw the Diamond-smallK at trick 1. Playing on clubs would not be a success but with the spade finesse working, the only loser would be the trump king with East’s third spade being ruffed in dummy.

However, with the appearance of the Diamond-small6 on their left and the weak jump on their right, East decided that as long the heart finesse worked, they could give up a diamond to East and discard a spade from dummy on the third round of diamonds. That was by no means a foolproof plan. However, convinced that the diamond finesse was losing, East played Diamond-smallA at trick 1 and then a low trump to Heart-small10. South took that and the next trick with red suit kings.

As stated, there was no advantage in leading Diamond-smallK as opposed to the small diamond. Yet, just sometimes the small diamond might work out better. It certainly did for the partnership of GeO Tislevoll and Prem Soundra. The lead of the small diamond is a lead befitting the vastly experienced GeO. Yet, GeO sat North.

prem 23.jpg

Great lead, Prem.

Richard Solomon

Go Back View All News Items

Our Sponsors
  • Tauranga City Council
  • TECT.jpg