All News

Daily Bridge in New Zealand

Taking the Right Lead.

Today’s story revolves not just around making the right opening lead but is also a story of bridge ethics, of doing the right thing at the right time. Ironically, the choice of opening lead did not matter greatly as the end result would likely be the same whatever choice was made but that need not have been so.

Under the conditions given (the opposition bidding), we gave you a rather unusual bidding sequence:
Bridge in NZ.pngnz map.jpg

East Deals
Both Vul
   
6
Q J 5 4 3
J 7 4
K J 10 8
 
N
W   E
S
   
West North East South
    1 NT 2 
2  Pass 3  3 
4  4  Pass Pass
Dbl All pass    

1NT was 15-17 and we told you that 2Diamond-small showed both majors. Despite that, East-West ploughed on to game in 4Heart-small though encouraged by their partner’s unusual 3Spade-small bid, North bid on to 4Spade-small with East producing a red card.

If you take in all the facts above, then there can be only one card for you to lead. Logic must take precedence to guidelines about never leading a singleton trump. You have been told that South has four hearts. East must have at least three hearts to invite game. Therefore, you know North has at most one heart, very likely less, and that the declarer will want to ruff their losing hearts in dummy.

A different explanation

So, the trump lead was not hard to find. Yet, the bidding was conducted with a different explanation given to South’s 2Diamond-small bid. It was alerted and explained as any single-suited hand. While West may or may not have bid 2Heart-small had they known South held both majors (I suspect not and that West might have doubled hoping their partner could handle 2Spade-small as West would relish the prospects of defending 2Heart-small doubled), they had no qualms about bidding 2Heart-small or even raising to 4Heart-small on the given explanation without worrying unduly about a bad heart break.

So, that was the situation during the bidding. South announced their "suit" as spades.

The time to tell

Based on the explanation given, the opening lead was not hard for West to find, Heart-smallQ. It was almost on the table before South pointed out the explanation was incorrect and explained that they held both majors. Absolutely the right time to correct the misexplanation. Had South been a defender, they would have had to keep quiet until the end of the play and perhaps suffer the consequences of the misexplanation afterwards. As declarer, they could/should correct the wrong before the opening lead was made. Indeed, that was what happened.

East Deals
Both Vul
J 9 8
Q 10 9 8 6 3 2
9 3 2
6
Q J 5 4 3
J 7 4
K J 10 8
 
N
W   E
S
 
K 7 5 2
A 8 6 2
K 5
A Q 4
 
A Q 10 4 3
K 10 9 7
A
7 6 5
West North East South
    1 NT 2 
2  Pass 3  3 
4  4  Pass Pass
Dbl All pass    

You might query whether South should have bid 3Spade-small. West would have raised to game even without South’s bid and would have been extremely hard-pressed to come to 10 tricks even if they guessed miraculously that South’s Diamond-smallA was singleton. Declarer will concede a second trump trick (and thus the 4th trick for the defence) the moment Diamond-smallK is played.

In 4Spade-smallx, the declarer won the opening trump lead in hand (East ducking, correctly), cashed Diamond-smallA and ruffed a heart. Then followed a diamond ruff and a second heart ruff. East ruffed the Diamond-smallQ continuation with South over-ruffing. South’s best exit was a club but soon found they had to ruff the fourth round of the suit.

Down to two losing hearts and Spade-smallAQ, declarer exited a heart and managed to avoid losing to the Spade-smallK (West was end-played into giving South their two trump tricks) but still lost three clubs and two hearts to be two down. Ironically, there would still be five losers after Heart-smallQ lead even though the same end-play would not occur. Declarer will lose to the Spade-smallK instead of the second heart loser.

Hamilton’s Nigel Gresson could not have known that when he corrected the wrong explanation. He played the game in the right manner. As declarer (or even as dummy), you must correct a wrong explanation before the opening lead.

 North-South may have suffered a penalty and not just  the -500. Had the true explanation been known earlier and West had doubled 2Diamond-small, North-South had two ways of getting a very good result, an unlikely one of 2Diamond-smallx being passed out (a very comfortable make) or of East doubling 2Spade-small for penalties, which, as we have seen, would also make.
time to do the right thing.jpg

 

Would West have bid 4Heart-small had they known South held at least four trumps? They might but a directing panel might be required to adjudicate whether the infraction (wrong explanation) had caused the damage when 4Heart-small failed.

Some unknowns but what is certain is when dummy is known to be very short in declarer’s second bid (or not bid!) suit is that a trump lead is a good idea, no matter what trump holding the defender on lead has. Oh, they are excused from leading one if they are void in trumps!

 How Good is the News?

     
West Deals
Both Vul
 
N
W   E
S
   
 
6 3
A K Q J 7
7
K 8 5 4 3
West North East South
Pass 1  Pass 2 
Pass 4  Pass ?

4Club-small shows a singleton or void club with heart support. Oh, it’s forcing to game! How great are your ambitions? Worth a cue bid? Where to from here?

Richard Solomon



Go Back View All News Items

Our Sponsors
  • Tauranga City Council
  • tourismbop.jpeg
  • TECT.jpg
  • NZB Foundation