All News

Tales of Akarana

                        Following and Breaking the Rules.

If the rather dull series of mainly part-score boards from this evening are repeated at next week’s National Bridge Congress, many will demand their money back! However, one board gave one pair an opportunity to follow a good guideline and another to break one… and both pairs were right!

What action would you take as South with the following?

Spade-small KQJ

Heart-small A5

Diamond-small KQT3

  Club-smallAQT7

after East on your right opens 3Heart-small with only North-South vulnerable? We do not really want to play 5 of a minor while 4Spade-small has its deficiency too. So, “when in doubt and 3NT is an option", bid it! That’s what happened at at least two tables ….. but at one, the bidding was not yet over:

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
9 8 6 4
7 2
9 6 2
K 9 3 2
A 7 5 3 2
8 6
A J 7 4
J 8
 
N
W   E
S
 
10
K Q J 10 9 4 3
8 5
6 5 4
 
K Q J
A 5
K Q 10 3
A Q 10 7
West North East South
  Pass 3  3 NT
Pass Pass 4  Dbl
All pass      

 

Was East guilty of bidding the same hand twice? They could be found guilty of such an offence but there seemed little chance of defeating 3NT opposite a passed partner. Therefore, the sacrifice, as surely 4Heart-small would be, might be cheap.

3NT requires, after an initial heart lead and duck by declarer, that West holds both missing aces. The early fall of the Spade-small10 on the was rather handy for South, too.

4Heart-smallx was never to be worse than two down though after Diamond-smallK was led and ducked, West switched to a high spade and took the first round of trumps to play a second spade. (The contract is only ever one down after the high diamond is ducked at trick 1.) A diamond finesse saw the declarer dispose of one club and escape for one down.

At most tables, either East opened 3Heart-small and West raised to game or South made a take-out double of either a 4Heart-small opening (4Heart-small was certainly the winner for East this time) as North emerged with 4Spade-small which was twice doubled and always defeated. So, even though East saved disaster by escaping the making 3NT, they should have opened at the 4 level with that heart suit and a passed partner. You be judge. Was East guilty of the crime of bidding the same hand twice or of having made the wrong opening bid first time?

You can tell me your answer at next week’s National Congress. “Tales of Akarana” will return once the exciting hands at Hamilton have been played.

Richard Solomon

 

Go Back View All News Items

Our Sponsors
  • NZB Foundation
  • JLT and Chubb Logo square 02.jpg
  • City Council square logo.png
  • Ryman