Unintended Bid

 

East opens 3H.  West asks for aces, rebids 5S, and then calls the Director claiming an unintended bid, wanting to stop in 5H.   E-W have no agreement for 5S here.      

Q1 Does the 3H opening set trumps ?   so that 5S could indeed be ruled unintended ...

Q2 Given that the Director call created UI, can West correct to 6H ?   (West has a spade void.)

Q3 If you allow 6H and it is a top board, do you adjust ?

 

 

WEST EAST
Spade-smallAQJT2 Spade-small -
Heart-smallK6 Heart-smallAJT7542
Diamond-smallAJ84 Diamond-smallT93
Club-smallQ7 Club-smallKT6

                  

thanks

Started by GILES HANCOCK on 30 Mar 2021 at 11:42AM

Post a Comment

You need to be logged in to reply to threads.
Click here to log in.

Latest Posts on this Thread

  1. Johan Forsberg10 Apr 2021 at 11:59AM

    I don't understand how this exactly happened. I want to bid 2H, OK I grab some more bidding cards than intended (happens all the time), then after I place it on the table don't I look at what I have put on the table? I guess it can happen that I grab a clearly thicker bunch of cards, place it, and because it's in the same denomination, I don't notice it until much later. I'm not saying that N is lying, just that she should check online casino real money nz.

  2. GILES HANCOCK10 Apr 2021 at 09:14PM

    Bidding PAD

     

  3. NICK WHITTEN11 Apr 2021 at 05:08PM


    I would rule 3S as unintended
    It looks quite irrational to me

    And I wouldn't put any constraints on partners actions following that
    What UI (if any) does not demonstrably favour bidding 6H

    I don't think the director should adjust in the event of a call he allowed to make being a good result for the offending side unless Law 72C or Law 23C kicks in

You need to be logged in to reply to threads.
Click here to log in.
Our Sponsors
  • Tauranga City Council
  • tourismbop.jpeg
  • TECT.jpg
  • NZB Foundation