Misinformation

Board 18 Dlr: E Vul: N-S Q92 A732 QT53 98   K4 QJT654 92 AKT T8753 K9 AJ6 Q72   8   13   10   9 AJ6 8 K874 J6543 N: 11 S: 12 E: 412NT W: 412NT Replay and analyze

West opens the bidding 2H (the pair plays weak 2th). It was not alerted as all members of the club play weak 2's. N and E pass and S doubles
which is followed by three passes.

West makes 4H which gives E/W a top score and S calles the Director.

West claims that the K of S was hidden and that he had opened a weak 2 as he assumed that he had only 10 pts, he only noticed the K after play had started. S argues that he had not X if West had opened 1H. East points out that this had also influenced his bidding as if West had opened 1H he would have entered the auction with his 10 point.

All the other tables are in 4H making.

What would be the ruling

Started by MARION ARLIDGE on 16 Oct 2025 at 11:29AM