Yes I have an opinion  

Theres no logical (or legal)  reason why they should be the same except in the interests of simplicity
The definition of "reverse" for count is arbitrary anyway

Personally I prefer to play reverse attitude on partners lead but standard attitude for discards

Off the subject a bit but that is to allow a non-commital discard

If I have the King in two suits I want partner to lead the one he has the Queen in
and not try to guess which one that might be - hence a non-commital (low card) discard

cheers
Nick

Count? Who plays Count? Who teaches Count?

Look at Teaching, Improvers, Lesson 8, 3C. Count? You must be joking?

Stanley I think you mistakenly thought this was the Teaching forum

It is Master Solvers

cheers
Nick

Sorry about that, Nick.

Trying to stay slightly on track, what is your method regarding a Doublton? Do you lead a high one or low one? Do you use the same method if partner is on lead?

What I see from inexperienced players, is that they play high low from doubltons, yet say they are playing reverse attitude.  I don't really know if that is correct, particularly if they don't play count, and not playing count is very much the norm, where ever I go in NZ.