Luck or skill?

To win an open pairs tournament is luck or skill more important?

Generally at the start of any open tournament there are only a handful of pairs that realistically are expected to have a chance to win the tournament. These favourites are recognisable as they normally contain two grandmasters. Within this group their favouritism will be ranked in proportion to their total rating points. But what actually determines which of these favoured pairs will eventually prevail? Luck or superior skill?

Taking the recent Palmerston North Christmas 3A pairs as an atypical example because the open tournament had a field with a wide skill/experience level. This tournament was won by Grandmasters Pamela Livingstone and Alastair Stuck (75.33% and 57.8% ) from Grandmasters Robin & Don Nightingale (58.85% and 67.2%). Fine results for both, with a comfortable win for Pamela and Alastair in the end by 7.08 %. Of the 64 pairs taking part by my count there were about a dozen Grandmasters pairs in the field that were favoured to win before the tournament started. 

A couple of boards illustrate though how different their results may have been:

Morning session Board 13 All Vulnerable Dealer N:

                              Spade-small 9653

                              Heart-small Q83

                              Diamond-small AQJ3

                              Club-small 76

Spade-small 4                                                 Spade-small AKQJT

Heart-small AK75                                          Heart-small 92

Diamond-small 752                                            Diamond-small K96

Club-small KT532                                        Club-small AQ4

                            Spade-small 872

                            Heart-small JT64

                            Diamond-small T84

                            Club-small J98

        

Pam and Alastair played in 3NT with East declarer making 7 after a Heart-small lead for a 89% board (3.7 %) while Robin and Don also played in 3NT with East declarer making 6 after a Heart-small lead for a 34 % board (1.33%). If either had bid and made 6NT they would have got a 95% board (3.95%).  Only with assistance from the defense can 7 be made.

 

Afternoon session Board 4 All Vulnerable Dealer W:

                                 Spade-small -

                                 Heart-small AQT

                                 Diamond-small AT974

                                 Club-small KQJ95

Spade-small 8732                                                         Spade-small J96

Heart-small J97                                                           Heart-small 6543

Diamond-small -                                                               Diamond-small K632

Club-small A86432                                                    Club-small T7

                                  Spade-small AKQT54

                                  Heart-small K82

                                  Diamond-small QJ85

                                  Club-small -

Pamela  and Alastair took 6Diamond-small by North light by 2 after a TClub-small lead for a 100% board (4.17%) while Robin and Don took 6NT light by North 1 after a Heart-small lead for a 90% board (3.75%). If the opposition had made their 6Diamond-small or 6NT contracts as they should have they would have had 24% & 8% boards respectively (1% & 0.33%). Although 6Diamond-small is potentially tricky if East holds up their KDiamond-small after the North ruffs the initial lead and leads the QDiamond-small with best line to cross to North’s hand to ruff a Club-small before discarding North’s remaining Club-small on 3 top Spade-small before drawing remaining trumps.

So back to my original question is it luck or skill that is more important to determine which of the favoured pairs will win an open pairs tournament? My theory is that for fields of diverse skill luck is the bigger factor once pairs have obtained the skills and experience to have reached grandmaster status. And if it is luck then we lesser pairs that have not reached grandmaster status also have a slim chance if we are really lucky on the day to strike the right pairs on the right hands.

 

 

   

Started by SEAN LYNCH on 15 Dec 2018 at 11:23PM

Post a Comment

You need to be logged in to reply to threads.
Click here to log in.

Latest Posts on this Thread

  1. JOHN O'CONNOR22 Dec 2018 at 09:29PM

    You have omitted a third factor which is also very important.

    Form.

    This is more important than luck. Think of it as how well do you play compared to how well you can play.

    How well are you and your partner prepared for the event? Had enough sleep? Free of domestic and work distractions? No health issues? Correct nutrition before and during the event? Arrived in good time for the event? For me, these things can all make a difference between a 60%+ session and barely making 50%.

     

  2. Scott Smith19 Jan 2019 at 10:20PM

    Skill.  But as John says "skill" is not constant.  Form, or "how skillfull am I today", is the key.

    The alternative is that some players are consistently more lucky than others.  Or to take your example, some grand masters are consistently more lucky many other grand masters.   The just doesn't stand to reason.

    Regards, Scott

You need to be logged in to reply to threads.
Click here to log in.
Our Sponsors
  • Tauranga City Council
  • tourismbop.jpeg
  • TECT.jpg
  • NZB Foundation